|
POD
Innovation Award

Guidelines for Submissions
Submit Your Entry via Email by Wednesday, September 10, 2008
History and Purpose
It was at the 1986 annual POD conference
in Hidden Valley, Pennsylvania, that Marilla Svinicki and
Marilyn Leach launched the Bright Idea Award (BIA). Their
purpose was to recognize innovative ideas that have improved
learning and teaching, as well as enhanced the general
effectiveness of higher education faculty members. The basic
intent was to share innovative ideas with the POD membership
and encourage others to adapt the ideas for their own use, as
well as to develop useful innovations themselves.
Continuing this tradition at each annual
conference of the POD Network, the Bright Idea Awards were
presented to participants who implemented creative ideas for
the enhancement of teaching and learning and/or faculty
development. In 2004 the name of the award was changed to the
POD Innovation Award. Recipients are recognized at the
Saturday evening banquet with either a Recognition Candle
Award or an engraved plaque. The winner of this award has the
option to receive the Innovation Award (formally called Bright
Idea) Lamp, a traveling trophy to be displayed at the host
institution of the first author listed on the award.
POD
Innovation
Award
SEEKERS
Eligibility
We encourage both new and experienced
participants at the annual POD conference in Reno, NV (October
22-25, 2008), to submit an entry. We will notify finalists of
the POD Innovation Award on or before Wednesday, September
24, 2008; for all recipients, to win the POD Innovation
Award, at least one author listed on the innovation poster is
required to (a) present a poster session at the POD conference
and distribute a handout describing their Innovation Award,
and (b) attend the Saturday evening banquet and awards
ceremony.
Selection Process
A committee of POD Network members representing
various programs and institutions will select up to seven (7)
entries that are judged to be strongest using the criteria of
(a) originality, (b) scope and results, (c) transferability,
and (d) effectiveness. For example:
|